According to the Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, the project manager should get commitment from the team to include all of the required regulations in the MVP when there is no consensus to do so. This is because the MVP is the version of the product that delivers the most value to the customer while meeting the minimum requirements and constraints1. If the project manager identifies some mandatory regulations that are essential for the product to be viable, compliant, and safe, then they should be included in the MVP, regardless of the impact on the project duration2. The project manager should explain the importance and rationale of the regulations to the team and stakeholders, and seek their agreement and support to incorporate them in the MVP3. The other options, A, C, and D, are not appropriate actions for the project manager to take. Training the team on the new regulations as requested by management may not resolve the lack of consensus or commitment from the team and stakeholders, and may delay the MVP definition process. Asking the project sponsor to add more time to the project may not be feasible or necessary, and may not address the root cause of the disagreement. Sharing with participants the need to focus only on product functionality may ignore the regulatory requirements and risks, and may compromise the quality and value of the product. References: 1: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 4.1.2, " Minimum Viable Product " . 2: How to Define a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) - ProjectManager.com, Section " What Is a Minimum Viable Product? " . 3: How to use Consensus Decision-Making for Project Management, Section " The 6 Stages of Consensus Decision-Making " .