警察官が国境検問所の犯罪現場に到着しました。そこでは、金融詐欺事件の容疑者が逮捕されていました。逮捕手続き中、警察官は容疑者の所持品の中にノートパソコンを発見しました。ノートパソコンには、肉眼で確認できる犯罪の明確な証拠が含まれていました。警察官は令状を持っていませんが、改ざんの可能性を防ぐため、直ちに機器を押収する必要があります。このような状況で警察官が取るべき適切な措置は何でしょうか?
正解:B
Under CHFI v11 Computer Forensics Fundamentals , investigators must understand the legal principles governing search and seizure of digital evidence , especially in exceptional environments such as national border crossings . Two key legal doctrines apply directly to this scenario: the Border Search Exception and the Plain View Doctrine .
The Border Search Exception allows law enforcement officers to conduct searches at international borders without a warrant or probable cause to protect national security and prevent cross-border crime. CHFI v11 highlights border environments as special jurisdictions where warrant requirements are relaxed due to the government's heightened authority to regulate entry and exit of persons and goods.
Additionally, the Plain View Doctrine permits officers to seize and examine evidence immediately visible during a lawful arrest, provided the officer is legally present and the incriminating nature of the evidence is obvious. In this case, the laptop is in the suspect's immediate possession, and evidence of the crime is visible without manipulation.
CHFI v11 emphasizes that delaying action in such situations could result in evidence destruction, encryption, or remote wiping , especially with digital devices. Therefore, securing and searching the laptop immediately is justified and legally defensible.
The other options are incorrect because they impose unnecessary delays or conditions not required under border search authority. Therefore, fully aligned with CHFI v11 principles, the correct action is that the officer may search the laptop without a warrant , making Option B the correct answer.