大手テクノロジー企業のサイバーセキュリティアナリストが、社内ネットワーク内で不審なファイルを発見した。マルウェアの可能性を懸念したアナリストは、そのファイルがもたらす潜在的な脅威を評価するため、静的解析と動的解析の両方を実施することにした。
上記のシナリオにおいて、疑わしいファイルに対して静的解析を実施する主な目的は何でしょうか?
正解:A
Option A is the best answer because CHFI v11 explicitly includes Malware Analysis: Static and Dynamic and the use of a controlled malware analysis lab to examine suspicious files safely. The defining purpose of static analysis is to inspect a file without executing it , allowing the investigator to identify indicators such as strings, imports, headers, embedded resources, suspicious metadata, obfuscation, or other structural signs of malicious intent.
This is different from dynamic analysis , which involves running the file in a sandbox or controlled environment to observe behavior. Option B and C therefore describe dynamic analysis, not static analysis.
Option D may be part of deeper reverse engineering, but it is narrower and more advanced than the broader primary purpose of static analysis, which is safe, non-executing inspection to identify likely threats.
Because the question asks for the main reason to perform static analysis, the most accurate CHFI-aligned answer is analyzing the suspicious file's code and structure without running it in order to identify potential security threats.