経験豊富なフォレンジック調査員であるレベッカは、一流テクノロジー企業で発生した可能性のあるデータ漏洩の調査に呼ばれた。漏洩した情報には、非常に価値の高い機密設計図ファイルが含まれているようだ。同社のネットワークは侵害されており、漏洩は継続中であると思われる。レベッカのチームの若手メンバーは、さらなる漏洩を防ぐためにサーバーを停止することを提案する。しかし、レベッカはそれがデジタルフォレンジックの重要な原則に反することを知っている。その原則とは何だろうか?
正解:A
Option A is the best answer. The wording appears to contain a typo, and in CHFI context this clearly points to the principle of data preservation . CHFI v11 emphasizes live acquisition , order of volatility , evidence preservation , and the need to collect volatile information before actions are taken that may destroy it. In an active breach on a running server, abruptly shutting the system down may destroy critical volatile evidence such as RAM contents, active network connections, running processes, logged-in sessions, encryption artifacts, and other transient indicators that may explain how the leak is occurring.
This is why CHFI distinguishes between live acquisition and dead acquisition and teaches investigators to determine the best acquisition method before taking action. Federal Rules of Evidence and the Best Evidence Rule are legal concepts, but they do not directly describe the operational mistake of powering off a live compromised server. Sanitizing target media applies to preparing destination media for acquisition, not preserving a live source system. Therefore, the key violated principle is the preservation of data, especially volatile evidence on a live system.