第三者によるサーベイランス監査において、監査人はマネジメントレビュー会議の議事録に、前回のレビューで設定された改善措置が2年連続で完了していないことが記録されていることを発見しました。議事録には、状況を改善するために中間管理職レベルの新しい品質管理マネージャーが採用されたと記載されています。
経営トップは、経営レビュー会議の議事録にコピーされる以外、QMS には関与していないことがわかります。
監査により、新しい品質管理者は経営陣から以下の責任を与えられたことが明らかになりました。
a) QMSの有効性について責任を負う。
b) トップマネジメントへの関与や報告なしに改善活動を選択、承認、監視し、c) QMS の改善を促進し、d) トップマネジメントによって QMS に割り当てられた限られた財源と人的資源を効率的に活用します。
監査人は、ISO 9001:2015 の条項 5.1.1 に対する不適合があるかどうかを検討します。
このような不適合に必要な証拠のオプションを 2 つ選択します。
正解:A,F
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Clause 5.1.1 of ISO 9001:2015 - Leadership and Commitment - specifically mandates that top management must take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS. They are also responsible for ensuring:
Integration of the QMS into business processes (5.1.1 c)
Promotion of customer focus and continual improvement (5.1.1 d, i)
Availability of necessary resources (5.1.1 e)
That the QMS achieves its intended results (5.1.1 g)
Let's analyze the selected options:
# A. Top management is not accountable for the effectiveness of the QMS.
This directly violates clause 5.1.1 a, which explicitly requires top management to take accountability for the effectiveness of the QMS. Delegating this to a middle-level Quality Manager, as described in the scenario, constitutes a nonconformity.
# F. The Quality Manager does not have access to the resources needed for the QMS.
According to clause 5.1.1 e, top management must ensure the availability of required resources for maintaining and improving the QMS. If the Quality Manager is resource-constrained, it indicates top management has failed to meet this requirement.
Now, why the other options are incorrect in terms of direct clause 5.1.1 nonconformity:
# B. Avoiding giving improvement actions to the Chief Executive - While this may reflect poor communication, it is not, by itself, a clear breach of 5.1.1 unless linked directly to top management's lack of accountability or commitment.
# C. Chief Executive never attending meetings - ISO 9001 does not require physical attendance of the Chief Executive at management reviews. What matters is whether top management is fulfilling their roles, not how.
# D. Completing only half of improvement actions - This indicates performance issues but does not necessarily indicate top management's lack of accountability, unless they failed to monitor progress entirely.
# E. Reporting to one designated senior manager - This is not inherently nonconforming unless that senior manager does not fulfill top management's responsibilities under 5.1.1.
Relevant ISO 9001:2015 Reference:
Clause 5.1.1 a, e, g, h:
" Top management shall demonstrate leadership and commitment with respect to the quality management system by:
a) taking accountability for the effectiveness of the quality management system; e) ensuring that the resources needed for the quality management system are available... "