This scenario should be solved with standard metadata. Use B. Highlights Panel. The selected option is not chosen because it sounds familiar; it is chosen because it gives Salesforce the right instruction at runtime.
Lightning App Builder controls page composition, component visibility, activation, assignments, and specialized surfaces such as record pages, home pages, action regions, activity surfaces, and utility bars.
The scenario describes a business outcome, not merely an administrative preference. If the feature is configured correctly, users get the intended result without depending on memory, spreadsheets, or manual policing. That is the professional standard for Platform App Builder work: place the rule in metadata, test it under the correct permissions, and keep the design supportable.
The alternatives are plausible only if the requirement is read too narrowly. A (Custom Lightning Web Component) should be rejected because A Lightning component changes the interface; it does not automatically solve security, relationship, or data-quality requirements. C (Path) does not fit cleanly; it solves a symptom of the problem rather than the Salesforce mechanism that owns the result. D (Accordion) is only a partial match because it does not provide the same direct administrative control as the selected option. A complete implementation should also check page assignment, field access, record ownership, and mobile behavior where those factors apply.
---