A properly written requirement statement should be clear, concise, consistent, complete, and testable. It should specify what the product or service should do, not how it should do it. It should also avoid using ambiguous or vague words that could be interpreted differently by different stakeholders. Among the four options, only option C meets these criteria. Option C is a properly written requirement statement because it clearly and precisely defines the attribute of the pot (the colors) and the possible values for that attribute (yellow, red, brown, blue). It is also consistent with the standard terminology and format for requirement statements, and it is complete and testable, as it can be verified by inspection or measurement. Option A is not a properly written requirement statement because it uses ambiguous and vague words such as "lightweight" and "heat up quickly". These words do not specify the exact or measurable criteria for the pot's weight and heating time, and they could mean different things to different stakeholders. Option B is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the conditions or constraints for the pot's usability in the oven or on the stove. For example, it does not state the maximum temperature or duration that the pot can withstand, or the type of oven or stove that the pot can be used on. Option D is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the requirement for the pot itself, but rather for the company brand. The company brand is not a feature or function of the pot, but rather a marketing or branding strategy. The requirement statement should focus on the pot's characteristics and capabilities, not on the company's image or reputation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, How To Write Good Requirements (With Example) - TestLodge Blog