Comprehensive and Detailed In Depth Explanation:
Let's evaluate each option based on the requirement of sub-millisecond latency for globally stored IoT data:
A). Spanner with Caching: While Spanner offers strong consistency and global scalability, the base latency might not consistently be sub-millisecond for all read/write operations globally. Introducing caching adds complexity and doesn't guarantee sub-millisecond latency for all initial reads or cache misses.
B). Bigtable: Bigtable is a highly scalable NoSQL database service designed for low-latency, high-throughput workloads. It excels at storing and retrieving large volumes of time-series data, which is typical for IoT sensor data. Its architecture is optimized for single-key lookups and scans, providing consistent sub-millisecond latency, making it a strong candidate for this use case.
C). BigQuery: BigQuery is a fully managed, serverless data warehouse designed for analytical queries on large datasets. While it's excellent for analyzing IoT data in batch, it's not optimized for the low-latency, high- throughput ingestion and retrieval required for real-time IoT applications with sub-millisecond latency needs.
D). Cloud Storage with Cloud CDN: Cloud Storage is object storage and is not designed for low-latency transactional workloads. Cloud CDN is a content delivery network that caches content closer to users for faster delivery, but it's not suitable for the primary storage of rapidly incoming IoT sensor data requiring sub- millisecond write latency.
Google Cloud Documentation References:
Cloud Bigtable Overview: https://cloud.google.com/bigtable/docs/overview - This document highlights Bigtable's suitability for low-latency and high-throughput applications, including IoT. It mentions its ability to handle massive amounts of data with consistent performance.
Spanner Overview: https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/overview - While Spanner offers low latency, Bigtable is generally preferred for extremely high-throughput, low-latency use cases like raw sensor data ingestion due to its optimized architecture for such workloads.
BigQuery Overview: https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/introduction - This emphasizes BigQuery's analytical capabilities rather than low-latency operational workloads.
Cloud Storage Overview: https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/overview - This describes Cloud Storage as object storage, not ideal for sub-millisecond latency reads and writes required for real-time IoT data.